<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Furstin Esterhazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mojeroze.pl/2012/01/furstin-esterhazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mojeroze.pl/2012/01/furstin-esterhazy/</link>
	<description>Odmiany, uprawa, pielęgnacja, historia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich Unmuth</title>
		<link>http://mojeroze.pl/2012/01/furstin-esterhazy/comment-page-1/#comment-24855</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Unmuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roses.webhost.pl/?p=11831#comment-24855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is most interesting that You are writing so extensivly about Rudolf Geschwind ans his roses.
Please don&#039;t be worry if I&#039;m correcting some facts You&#039;re mentioning.
&#039;Fürstin Esterhazy&#039; is a modern unidentified Polyantha, it is not a rose bred by Geschwind.
&#039;Erlkönig&#039; seems to be lost, the roses which is attributed to this name is mislabelled.
&#039;Aurelia Liffa&#039; is lost, too. The rose under this name in commerce doesn&#039;t match the historical descriptions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is most interesting that You are writing so extensivly about Rudolf Geschwind ans his roses.<br />
Please don&#8217;t be worry if I&#8217;m correcting some facts You&#8217;re mentioning.<br />
&#8216;Fürstin Esterhazy&#8217; is a modern unidentified Polyantha, it is not a rose bred by Geschwind.<br />
&#8216;Erlkönig&#8217; seems to be lost, the roses which is attributed to this name is mislabelled.<br />
&#8216;Aurelia Liffa&#8217; is lost, too. The rose under this name in commerce doesn&#8217;t match the historical descriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
